Difference between revisions of "PGP"

From OSINT.INFO
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Date||Source||Title||Tags
 
|Date||Source||Title||Tags
 +
|-
 +
|20180514||spiegel.de||[http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/pgp-gpg-oder-s-mime-experten-raten-vorerst-von-e-mail-verschluesselung-ab-a-1207559.html Kritische Schwachstelle Experten raten vorerst von E-Mail-Verschlüsselung ab]||[[PGP]]
 +
|-
 +
|20180514||gnupg.org||[https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060315.html Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME]||[[PGP]]
 +
|-
 +
|20180514||efail.de||[https://efail.de/efail-attack-paper.pdf Efail: Breaking S/MIME and OpenPGP Email Encryption using Exfiltration Channels (draft 0.9.0)]||[[PGP]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|20180514||efail.de||[https://efail.de/ EFAIL describes vulnerabilities in the end-to-end encryption technologies OpenPGP and S/MIME that leak the plaintext of encrypted emails.]||[[PGP]]
 
|20180514||efail.de||[https://efail.de/ EFAIL describes vulnerabilities in the end-to-end encryption technologies OpenPGP and S/MIME that leak the plaintext of encrypted emails.]||[[PGP]]

Latest revision as of 18:48, 14 May 2018